Okay, let's get started.
No one, however, may dedicate the firstborn of an animal, since the firstborn already belongs to the Lord; whether an ox
or a sheep, it is the Lord’s. If
it is one of the unclean animals, it may be bought back at its set
value, adding a fifth of the value to it. If it is not redeemed, it is
to be sold at its set value. But nothing that a person owns and devotes
to the Lord—whether a human being or an animal or family land—may be sold or redeemed; everything so devoted is most holy to the Lord.
No person devoted to destructionmay be ransomed; they are to be put to death (Lev. 27:26-29).
Notice
that no one could dedicate a firstborn of anything to Yahweh, because
he had already made clear back in Exodus that the firstborn of both man
and beast were his, and those things were to be redeemed (Ex.
12:13-15). The Hebrew bible is not new in laws of redemption. Other
pagan cultures often redeemed their sons with animals.
But here we see obviously that persons could be devoted to Yahweh in sacrifice and could not be redeemed. And indeed there are plenty of examples of such. So let's move on.
I'll go back to others, but I want to skip forward to Jephthah for now.
Then the Spirit of the Lord
came on Jephthah. He crossed Gilead and Manasseh, passed through Mizpah
of Gilead, and from there he advanced against the Ammonites. And Jephthah made a vow to the Lord: “If you give the Ammonites into my hands, whatever comes out of the door of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the Lord’s, and I will sacrifice it as a burnt offering.”
Then Jephthah went over to fight the Ammonites, and the Lord gave them into his hands. He devastated twenty towns from Aroer to the vicinity of Minnith, as far as Abel Keramim. Thus Israel subdued Ammon.
When
Jephthah returned to his home in Mizpah, who should come out to meet
him but his daughter, dancing to the sound of timbrels! She was an only
child. Except for her he had neither son nor daughter. When
he saw her, he tore his clothes and cried, “Oh no, my daughter! You
have brought me down and I am devastated. I have made a vow to the Lord that I cannot break.”
“My father,” she replied, “you have given your word to the Lord. Do to me just as you promised, now that the Lord has avenged you of your enemies, the Ammonites. But
grant me this one request,” she said. “Give me two months to roam the
hills and weep with my friends, because I will never marry.”
“You
may go,” he said. And he let her go for two months. She and her friends
went into the hills and wept because she would never marry. After the two months, she returned to her father, and he did to her as he had vowed. And she was a virgin.
From this comes the Israelite tradition that each year the young women of Israel go out for four days to commemorate the daughter of Jephthah the Gileadite (Judges 11:29-40).
The
tribal war god of Israel, Yahweh, accepted Jephthah's vow and let him
win the victory over the Ammonites. Jephthah's daughter went to mourn
her virginity for a couple months, but when she returned, he "...did to
her as he had vowed." And he had vowed to sacrifice her as a burnt
offering.
Now
I read many years in the past some apologetic article claiming that she
was not sacrificed but rather had to stay a virgin all her life, but
since the passage doesn't say that and is rather very clear about what
it does say, I just went on thinking that Jephthah was not approved by God. But this is far from the truth.
The
story continues after the death of Jephthah's daughter, and he was
granted even more victorious slaughter. And then the author of Hebrews
wrote in the so-called "faith" chapter:
And what more shall I say? For time would fail me to tell of Gideon,
Barak, Samson, Jephthah, of David and Samuel and the prophets—who through faith...(Heb. 11:32, 33a).
And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect (vs. 39-40)
How
sick! I don't approve of this!!! How did I not notice him in Hebrews
11?? But there's more, much more, so let's continue on. There's so
much else I see wrong now, anyway. I no longer see the people I thought
were good as good, like David. I'm awake now.
Okay, it's easy to see how I've read over this upcoming stuff before, because I lacked some important knowledge before. I had never heard of foundation sacrifices, so I could not possibly understand what was being said in the book of Joshua.
Foundation
sacrifices were common in ancient cultures. Modern archaeologists have
found many children within walls surrounding cities. Just Google about
foundation sacrifices. You can even go to Google Images.
Joshua laid an oath on them at that time, saying, “Cursed before the Lord be the man who rises up and rebuilds this city, Jericho.
“At the cost of his firstborn shall he
lay its foundation,
and at the cost of his youngest son
shall he set up its gates.”
So the Lord was with Joshua, and his fame was in all the land (Josh. 6:26-27).
That
wasn't just a threat that a person's child would be killed if he
rebuilt a city there (as if that in itself isn't bad enough, what's
wrong with building there?), but this is saying that the firstborn and
youngest children of the man who decides to build there would be
sacrificed for the foundations.
Fast-forward to the time of the reign of Judah's king Ahab:
In his days Hiel of Bethel built Jericho. He laid its foundation at the
cost of Abiram his firstborn, and set up its gates at the cost of his
youngest son Segub, according to the word of the Lord, which he spoke by Joshua the son of Nun (1 Kings 16:34).
This
is sick! Yahweh cursed people for rebuilding where Jericho is and
commanded foundation sacrifices of the builder's firstborn and youngest
sons. Sick! Sick! Sick! Oh, and I just realized, that's another
contradiction (out of hundreds and hundreds in the bible)! Remember
according to Exodus and Leviticus the firstborn son of someone is to be
Yahweh's, but is supposed to be redeemed and so cannot be devoted to
destruction. Only other people were supposed to be allowed to be devoted
as sacrifices or burnt offerings.
It
is believed by Christians that Jesus of Nazareth (even though that town
didn't exist in the first century) was the son of Yahweh (though Yahweh
is a really a non-entity but one of the many sons of El the head god of
the Canaanite pantheon). If it was truly so important that the town of
Jericho never be rebuilt, if it was truly so abominable that someone
rebuild in that location and call it by that name, then surely Jesus
would have not ever gone to Jericho. Or if the foundation sacrifices of
Hiel's firstborn and youngest sons were abominable to God (though it's
clear in Joshua and 1 Kings that it was Yahweh's curse and commandment),
then Jesus surely had an opportunity to say something during his visits
to Jericho. See Mark 10:46; Matt. 20:29; Luke 18:35; 19:1
Not
too abominable to be in existence again, is it? Nah...just wanted to
make sure the foundations included two sons of the builder, that's all.
Then
there's the king of Moab who sacrificed his son for a god's favor in
battle, since Israel was attacking. Once his son was burnt as an
offering, wrath (from a god, supposedly) came upon Israel, so Israel
fled. Now it's unclear whether the king sacrificed his son to the
Moabite god Chemosh or the Israelite god Yahweh, but either way they all
thought it worked. Israel fled. Either Chemosh came out to be the
stronger god in that battle because the sacrifice was to him, or Yahweh
was incensed against his own people because the Moabite king sacrificed
to him when Israel did not. This is all found in 2 Kings 3:26-27. If
you go back and read what was leading up to this, the wicked prophet
Elisha (same guy who cursed in the name of Yahweh for bears to come out
of the forest and maul to death 42 young guys/kids simply for making fun
of Elisha for being bald) said that Yahweh promised that the Moabites
would be delivered into Israel's hands. That didn't happen. All was
going all right for Israel until the sacrifice by the king of Moab.
Have
you ever noticed in scriptures like Leviticus 18:21 and Deuteronomy
12:31 and others, that they command not to sacrifice one's children in
fire to Molech or other gods? Those of us who find human sacrifice
appalling and have been taught that the bible god is a god of love
naturally assume these scriptures mean no child sacrifices or burnt
offerings of humans, period. But when we carefully examine the bible as
a whole, two things become clear:
1. The bible contradicts itself a lot.
2.
Yahweh loved burning animals and humans and loved murdering in general.
He loved genocide and when his followers killed babies and bashed
babies on stones and ripped open pregnant women and made great
bloodshed. But the catch is that he only delighted greatly in these
things if they were offered to him.
You slaughtered my children and sacrificed them to the idols (Ezek. 16:21).
Do not worship any other god, for Yahweh, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous god (Ex. 34:14).
So I gave them other statutes that were not good and laws through which they could not live; defiled them through their gifts—the sacrifice of every firstborn—that I
might fill them with horror so they would know that I am the Lord.’ (What a sicko)“Therefore, son of man, speak to the people of Israel and say to them, ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: In this also your ancestors blasphemed me by being unfaithful to me: When
I brought them into the land I had sworn to give them and they saw any
high hill or any leafy tree, there they offered their sacrifices, made
offerings that aroused my anger, presented their fragrant incense and
poured out their drink offerings. Then I said to them: What is this high place you go to?’ (Sounds like someone is jealous)” (It is called Bamah
to this day.) “Therefore say to the Israelites: ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: Will you defile yourselves the way your ancestors did and lust after their vile images? When
you offer your gifts—the sacrifice of your children in the fire—you
continue to defile yourselves with all your idols to this day. Am I to
let you inquire of me, you Israelites? As surely as I live, declares the
Sovereign Lord, I will not let you inquire of me (Ezekiel 20:25-31).
When
we allow ourselves to wake up, we see the bible for what it really is.
People say they think the things Stalin, Hitler, Dracula and others did
were horrible things, but none of those people did anything as evil on
the huge scale that this Yahweh character did.
It's
OKAY to wake up and stand up for what is moral and right. It's good
and respectable to say, "You know, something is WRONG here. This is not
good."
It's
OKAY to search through the bible and read it with an open mind,
scrubbed free from the programming, and realize, "You know, we've been
taught that Satan is the one who lied and murdered from the beginning,
but really the stories reveal that El and Yahweh lied from the beginning
and murdered. If anyone is Satan, it's Yahweh." Count the times
Yahweh murdered and then compare to the times Satan is said to have done
so. Count the times Yahweh deceived and then compare to the times
Satan is said to have done so. Count the times Yahweh commands rape and
compare to the times Satan commanded it. Do the same for coveting and
stealing and kidnapping and every other abomination. Search through the
bible and see how many times Yahweh commanded for these things to be
done, then go through the bible and count the times Satan did those same
things. Then you decide who is evil.
Let's examine this next passage:
Hear the word of the Lord, you kings of Judah and people of Jerusalem. This is what the Lord
Almighty, the God of Israel, says: Listen! I am going to bring a
disaster on this place that will make the ears of everyone who hears of
it tingle. For
they have forsaken me and made this a place of foreign gods; they have
burned incense in it to gods that neither they nor their ancestors nor
the kings of Judah ever knew, and they have filled this place with the
blood of the innocent. They
have built the high places of Baal to burn their children in the fire
as offerings to Baal—something I did not command or mention, nor did it
enter my mind. So beware, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when people will no longer call this place Topheth or the Valley of Ben Hinnom, but the Valley of Slaughter. ‘In this place I will ruin
the plans of Judah and Jerusalem. I will make them fall by the sword
before their enemies, at the hands of those who want to kill them, and I
will give their carcasses as food to the birds and the wild animals. I
will devastate this city and make it an object of horror and scorn; all
who pass by will be appalled and will scoff because of all its wounds. I
will make them eat the flesh of their sons and daughters, and they will
eat one another’s flesh because their enemies will press the siege so
hard against them to destroy them (Jeremiah 19:3-7).
He
was pissed because the Israelites were burning incense and children to
other gods. He was jealous again. The fact alone that there were
innocent children being murdered is obviously not the problem for him,
because he decided that since they wanted to serve other gods he would
make them eat the flesh of their sons and daughters when their enemies
would come against them. So much for caring for the innocent children!
No, of
course it didn't enter his mind for the Israelites to burn their
children in the fire to Baal. He had made clear all the children were
his (of which the firstborn were not to be killed, but rather he charged
a ransom for them, so the parents had to pay up). But sacrificing and
burning children most certainly did enter the mind of this
bloodthirsty monster. He never commanded anything to be done for other
gods, as he was a "no gods before me" and "jealous" god, but it "entered
his mind" for Isaac to be sacrificed and burnt, but then he provided a
ram for Abraham to murder and burn instead.
On to the next horror story...
As
readers may know, it was common in ancient cultures, during times of
famine, to offer up human sacrifices to appease the god(s). We may be
horrified by this, but what we ought to be more horrified by is the fact
that Israel and their tribal war god Yahweh were no different. And
shame on me, because some of these verses I'm about to share were
highlighted in one of my bibles as part of my family studies for an
upcoming book. Now, you'd think I'd have clued in then (like two years
ago) when I read over that. You'd think I would have paused and said
"What is this garbage? This is not only unfair, but this is no
different than other pagan cultures did!" But no, I was still living in
blindness.
During the reign of David, there was a famine for three successive years; so David sought the face of the Lord. The Lord said, “It is on account of Saul and his blood-stained house; it is because he put the Gibeonites to death.”
The
king summoned the Gibeonites and spoke to them. (Now the Gibeonites
were not a part of Israel but were survivors of the Amorites; the
Israelites had sworn to spare them, but Saul in his zeal for Israel and
Judah had tried to annihilate them.) David asked the Gibeonites, “What shall I do for you? How shall I make atonement so that you will bless the Lord’s inheritance?”
The
Gibeonites answered him, “We have no right to demand silver or gold
from Saul or his family, nor do we have the right to put anyone in
Israel to death.”
“What do you want me to do for you?” David asked.
They
answered the king, “As for the man who destroyed us and plotted against
us so that we have been decimated and have no place anywhere in Israel, let seven of his male descendants be given to us to be killed and their bodies exposed before the Lord at Gibeah of Saul—the Lord’s chosen one.”
So the king said, “I will give them to you.”
The king spared Mephibosheth son of Jonathan, the son of Saul, because of the oath before the Lord between David and Jonathan son of Saul. But
the king took Armoni and Mephibosheth, the two sons of Aiah’s daughter
Rizpah, whom she had borne to Saul, together with the five sons of
Saul’s daughter Merab,whom she had borne to Adriel son of Barzillai the Meholathite. He handed them over to the Gibeonites, who killed them and exposed their bodies on a hill before the Lord.
All seven of them fell together; they were put to death during the
first days of the harvest, just as the barley harvest was beginning...
And the bones of Saul and Jonathan his son buried they in the country of
Benjamin in Zelah, in the sepulchre of Kish his father: and they
performed all that the king commanded. And after that God was intreated
for the land. (2 Sam. 1-9, 14).
There
was a famine, David prayed and found out from their god Yahweh that it
was because he was angered over Saul killing the Gibeonites, David had
two sons and five grandsons of Saul's hanged, and then their god was
intreated.
Here we see one of the many
times Yahweh and his followers punished others for someone else's
doing. Of course, there's the huge contradiction in Ezekiel 18, which
happens to be one of my personal most-loved bible chapters, because of
its proper righteousness. It teaches that a father should not pay for
the sins of his son, nor a son pay for the sins of his father.
It's
all a lie, though, in Ezekiel 18, talking of how Yahweh says a man
should die of his own sin, because he commanded the opposite over and
over and over again through the horrible books in the bible. He was always
punishing others for someone's wrongdoing. David's baby would know all
about that. David and Bathsheba engaged in adulterous sex, made a
baby, and Yahweh decided to put the baby to death for David's sin.
Contradictory and unjust and just downright immoral and sick!
Most of us really would not live our lives the way Yahweh commanded Israel to do.
They were to do right to each other, but everyone outside of Israel who
did not serve Yahweh were free game to murder and genocide, to rape, to
lands being coveted and stolen, and more.
And Yahweh spake unto Moses, saying, Take
the sum of the prey that was taken, both of man and of beast, thou, and
Eleazar the priest, and the heads of the fathers houses of the
congregation; and divide the prey into two parts: between the men skilled in war, that went out to battle, and all the congregation. And
levy a tribute unto Yahweh of the men of war that went out to battle:
one soul of five hundred, both of the persons, and of the oxen, and of
the asses, and of the flocks: take it of their half, and give it unto Eleazar the priest, for Yahweh's heave-offering. And
of the children of Israel's half, thou shalt take one drawn out of
every fifty, of the persons, of the oxen, of the asses, and of the
flocks, even of all the cattle, and give them unto the Levites, that
keep the charge of the tabernacle of Yahweh. And Moses and Eleazar the priest did as Yahweh commanded Moses.
Now
the prey, over and above the booty which the men of war took, was six
hundred thousand and seventy thousand and five thousand sheep, and threescore and twelve thousand oxen, and threescore and one thousand asses, and thirty and two thousand persons in all, of the women that had not known man by lying with him. (Virgins)
And
the half, which was the portion of them that went out to war, was in
number three hundred thousand and thirty thousand and seven thousand and
five hundred sheep: and Yahweh's tribute of the sheep was six hundred and threescore and fifteen. And the oxen were thirty and six thousand; of which Yahweh's tribute was threescore and twelve. And the asses were thirty thousand and five hundred; of which Yahweh's tribute was threescore and one. And the persons were sixteen thousand; of whom Yahweh's tribute was thirty and two persons. And Moses gave the tribute, which was Yahweh's heave-offering, unto Eleazar the priest, as Yahweh commanded Moses (Num. 31:25-41).
I'm
taking it that these virgins weren't given the opportunity to "bewail
their virginity" as Jephthah's daughter did. Jephthah's daughter agreed
with the sacrifice. These poor captive virgins probably screamed and
struggled against the horrible heathen (Israelite) captors that murdered
them and burnt them to Yahweh, as Yahweh had commanded.
This is sick! This is evil! I do not approve of this.
And Saul said to Samuel, “I have obeyed the voice of the Lord. I have gone on the mission on which the Lord sent me. I have brought Agag the king of Amalek, and I have devoted the Amalekites to destruction. But the people took of the spoil, sheep and oxen, the best of the things devoted to destruction, to sacrifice to the Lord your God in Gilgal.” And Samuel said,
“Has the Lord as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices,
as in obeying the voice of the Lord?
Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice,
and to listen than the fat of rams.
For rebellion is as the sin of divination,
and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry.
Because you have rejected the word of the Lord,he has also rejected you from being king.” (1 Kings 15:20-23).
Then Samuel said, “Bring here to me Agag the king of the Amalekites.” And Agag came to him cheerfully. Agag said, “Surely the bitterness of death is past.” And
Samuel said, “As your sword has made women childless, so shall your
mother be childless among women.” And Samuel hacked Agag to pieces
before the Lord in Gilgal (vs. 32-33).
Note
the "devoted to destruction." Remember Leviticus 27:26-29, where any
person who is devoted to destruction must be murdered and burned.
Odd
how I never noted that Samuel did his little speech on being better to
obey than to sacrifice, but he turned around and sacrificed. It's
really good if you read the entire bit, as I did not include the whole
length of the chapter. The whole thing that was disobeyed in the first
place was not sacrificing things. So why say something so stupid as
that? And really, I've always looked at the "obey" part as obeying the
law of love. You know, love your neighbor as yourself. But so much of
what Yahweh commanded were things of wickedness. It was hate your
neighbor by wiping them out, including slaughtering babies, then saving
the virgins to rape, stealing their neighbors' lands, burning things.
Then it was burn hundreds of thousands of animals and burn people.
And
there we have it once again, punishing people for something someone
else did. Yahweh wanted a genocide of the Amalekites (including babies
and other children), because their ancestors from several hundred
years before did not let Israel through their land when they supposedly
came out of Egypt. Well, first of all, who could blame the Amalekites
for not wanting the Israelites on their land? They were a warring group
of people bent on destroying others. Secondly, what do the Amalekites
several hundred years later have to do with it?
Apparently
Yahweh didn't care about anyone else who were slaves to the Egyptians,
because in the slaughter of the firstborns of Egypt, it included the
firstborn of the maidservants! (Ex. 11:5) If they were slaves, then what
did they have to do with the slavery of the Israelites? Furthermore
Yahweh hardened the pharoah's heart, anyway, after every plague, and
what do the people have to do with what pharoah said, especially when
pharoah was being mind-controlled, anyway? And of course every time
Yahweh mind-controlled anyone or deceived anyone, the bible proclaims
that it was so he could show his power and might. What an evil tyrant!
You make a person do evil, and then you punish the person for doing
it. That's might loving, holy, and righteous. Too bad we don't see
parents the whole world over doing more of this with their kids. What a
fantastic world it would be. Really, you can start when they're really
young. Just take the arm of one of your children, make the child hit a
sibling, and then punish the child for it. Then you can say, "See how
powerful I am? Don't mess with me. I'm in charge, and if you don't
obey, I'll stone you or burn you to death." Wouldn't that be swell?
Long
after I'd answered a lot of childhood questions from having grown up
Protestant and had changed my beliefs after doing my research, to be a
"commandment-keeping Christian," I still have had questions lurking in
my mind. But without any doubt in my mind, the single biggest question
I've had over the past several years is:
We think
the modern parents who murder their children and claim God was testing
their faith to see how much they loved him are psychotic, and some even
say that it was really Satan who told those parents to do it, but yet
why didn't Abraham think that when he nearly murdered Isaac? Why didn't
he think that it was a demonic spirit?
If
we credit all the things we know in our hearts that are good to God and
all the things we know in our hearts that are bad to Satan, then how
can the Abraham story be explained?
All
it takes is for you to do your research. What Abraham and companions
did was not any different than what others did in the surrounding
cultures. That family was henotheistic. The Israelites chose Yahweh as
their single god to worship, rather than worship any of the other gods,
because they loved to kill, steal, and rape. Yahweh was the god of war
in the Canaanite pantheon of Gods (headed by El). If you look today in
Israel, you'll see nothing has changed. They still love to murder
others, steal people's land, and so on, and they claim they have the
right to do it all in the name of Yahweh, because they are his chosen
people.
Abraham
didn't mind cutting off foreskins, either. Hey look, the majority of
people in the United States still let their boys be circumcised without
questioning it, but I've had three boys, and we had none of them cut
on. I'm anti-genital mutilation. I watched a video (actually I could
not watch the entire thing, it was too violent and heartbreaking) of an
infant circumcision, and I decided right then I would not let any child
of mine undergo that procedure. I was able to use "new testament"
scripture, of course, to stay in line with my being a Christian. But if
I didn't have that, I would have just been disobedient to Yahweh's law.
If
I'm not even willing to unnecessarily let someone violently shed blood
from my sons' penises, what makes you think I'd prove my "faith" by
murdering a son for a god? Well, I wouldn't. Plain and simple.
Since
I would never do this, I do not know why Abraham would have shown his
faith by doing such a horrible thing. Since I'm unblinded and free from
this horrible bible cult, I will boldly say I do not respect the person
of Abraham whatsoever.
Nor
do I respect the person of Yahweh (who really doesn't exist but was one
of many made-up sons of El and brother of Baal and others). He showed
over and over and over again through the bible that he loved the most
atrocious murders, violent and bloody deaths against innocent babies and
pregnant mothers and rapes of virgins who had seen their families
murdered. Absolutely no mercy against those people because they did not
serve him. He showed himself to be very unjust by repeatedly
punishing innocent people for things other people did. The bible
repeatedly tells of him deceiving people or forcing them to do things
against their will so that he could then punish them. He demanded
constant human and animal slaughtering on a large scale and the burning
of their bodies so that he could smell it.
Is
it any surprise that someone would want to come along and change up
things to make things better? Doesn't it make sense that someone would
want to start a new cult in hopes that the Jews wouldn't be so
murder-crazy and rebellious? Even if it meant taking things here and
there from the bible to insert into his story to make it appear that a
messiah had come and fulfilled prophecy, I can understand why they
wanted to do it.
Should
we be surprised, though, that it's portrayed that Yahweh gave up his
own son to have him murdered because of something someone else did? We
should expect nothing else, since that's all he ever did throughout the
bible. He was always murdering people for things other people had
done. That's just his way. He delights in murdering innocent blood for
something someone else did. The only thing worse is that there was no
burning hell in the bible, but in the gospels there is a horrible
punishment for those after death who do not believe and obey the gospel
of Christ, who do not accept that Yahweh had his son murdered for
mankind.
You
know, I've never had trouble understanding that people who walk in
goodness deserve forgiveness and people who walk in wickedness without
remorse deserve punishment. But I never deeply questioned the Christ
sacrifice story, having it so ingrained within me all my life...until
one day I heard two persons discussing it, and the one person said, "Why
not just forgive?"
Wow. That really hit me. The following day I wandered around outside meditating on that. "Why not just forgive?"
Well,
yeah. Why not? That's a good question. I mean, after all, that's
what I do with my beloved children. I guide them in goodness, and when
they mess up, I talk to them, and I forgive. When I mess up, they
forgive me. Parents aren't without wrongdoings, either.
God
is the rule-maker. So why is our morality better than his? I speak of
this Yahweh that people assume is god. Of course he's not. He's a
bronze-age mythical god, one of many gods. But people have it
programmed into their minds that he's full of righteousness.
Well,
not according to my rulebook. And why should I respect him when he's
far worse than any cruel man dictator that has ever ruled on this
planet? That's not what I practice. And who does? Does anyone think
we should practice the immorality of Yahweh and his followers, as
explained in the bible?
Will
you be blind and say, "Who am I to say what's righteous?" Well, you've
got choices. You can submit to Yahweh and agree that he's perfect and
righteous. Or you could stop beating yourself up over your little
mistakes that pale in comparison to the wickedness of that tyrant. I
don't know any human being who is more immoral than the likes of Yahweh.
If he's a parent, he needs to ask for our
forgiveness for being such a horrible monster, a horrible example.
Just think of all the horrible wars just between Jews, Muslims, and
Christians? Think of all the horrible things done in history in the
name of that monster.
If
there really was a Yahweh and a Satan, it should be clear who is really
the good one and who is the bad one. All you've got to do is read your
bible! Tally up all the evil done by Yahweh (and it even says several
times that he does evil, and sometimes he even repents of the evil and
feels bad, but it's never long-lasting, as he's always quickly back to
unleashing the worst wrath on people) and that done by Satan, then you
judge.
If
there really was a Yahweh and a Satan, then who is really deceived? If
there really was a Satan, then I'd say Yahweh is the Satan, and he's
done a damn good job of deceiving everyone into worshiping his monstrous
being.
I
firmly believe there are two types of people in the world: good people
and bad people. It doesn't matter whether the person is Christian,
Muslim, Hindu, atheist, or else. There are bad people and good people
under all those labels.
And I like good people and being around good people.
As
for me and my household, we will serve goodness. Ol' Joshua and his
household liked to serve Yahweh, but I won't serve someone whose morals
are so beneath mine. A parent should guide a child in goodness and
lovingly guide. That Yahweh character stays hidden and pits everyone
against each other in the most horrible acts. He's a cowardly and evil
person. If I had created the earth and everyone, I'd be present and be
a loving guide, just as I am in real life to my children.
What about you? Do you love Yahweh the war god of the Israelites?
